Best casio fx-9750gii graphing calculator 2020.
1 – Casio Algebra FX 2.0 Graphing Calculator
Top Reviews My son (7th grade) got this, because he didn’t like solvingalgebra equations. This calculator does that, though theinterface for the equation solver is mildly clunky.Now my son finds that this is his preferred calculator ingeneral. One nice feature: when adding a column of numbers,it displays the ones you’ve entered, not just the currenttotal. And it’s easier to correct entries as you go. . Great! My dad love it . Bought this calculator to use while taking refresher math courses. It works great and the algebra tutor does show you how to work the problem. It doesn’t allows come up with the exact factoring or simplifying answers you might by hand but it justs requires a little mathematically tweak on the users part. Haven’t used a TI to compare it with . Just what I needed for school and it really helped me in Pre-Calculus. Thanks!! (They want six more wordy words.) Read more
2 – Casio Computer Co., Ltd – FX-7400G+ – Casio Graphing Calculator
Top Reviews I purchased this for a student and is my daughters class who was an able to afford I needed calculator so far it has worked great for her and all of the needs that she has had very happy with the purchase . My first CASIO programmable device which I use to program Land Surveying problems. . Arrived with one button dead, great product other than that. Seller took item back and refunded my money. A shame but a good experience nonetheless . It’s ok Read more
3 – Casio Touchscreen with Stylus Graphing Calculator, 4.8 (fx-CG500)
Top Reviews There seems to be some confusion regarding this calculator and the ClassPad 400. I have both and the only difference between them is the CP400 has a qwerty soft menu keyboard, whilst the new model is non-qwerty. In all other respects they are identical apart from just one personal observation: the touch screen has been slightly changed for the CG500. First I noticed the reflection has changed – it’s less sharp and there may be an extra element in it. The other change I’ve noticed is it is slightly less responsive to the stylus. Tapping did not always seem to register and sliding did not always highlight the whole selected. After using it for a couple of hours I went back to the 400 and there was a distinct improvement in response. BTW, I have two 400 and they are both more responsive than the 500.In conclusion, if you must have a non-qwerty calculator for an exam, the CG500 is an excellent calculator which will last you many years. However, if qwerty is not an issue I would advise buying the CP400 model because of the marginally more responsive screen. There is no difference between the screens when reading the calculations made, they are both just as sharp. I was hoping that Casio would upgrade the chip speed on the 500 but they haven’t. Compared with the TI-Nspire and HP Prime the Casio models are slower, but they are lovely calculators to use and remain my favourites despite their bulk. . Casio deserves a lot of credit for creating a truly innovative product that isn’t constrained by outdated design conventions. Many manufacturers are still making calculators with interfaces that are decades old and don’t take advantage of modern touchscreen technology. Casio started with a blank slate and designed something optimized for mathematics. The result is a machine that is a joy to use.I’ve owned many calculators in my life from the 1980s to the present, including classics like the HP 41-CX and HP 50G as well as various TI, Sharp and Casio scientific and engineering models. This is the first time I’ve used a calculator that did not require me to translate between the calculator’s proprietary notation and what you would find in a math textbook or scientific paper. This is a wonderful thing!This machine is a very powerful tool for exploring and learning mathematics and, of course, calculating. The interface for entering equations and making graphs is intuitive and efficient. The display is large enough to view functions side-by-side with their graphs. The touch screen and stylus are precise and sensitive. You can buy calculators with faster processors but, in many cases, the time you might gain in calculation speed you will lose while trying to navigate their frustrating, quirky interfaces. If you love math, you owe it to yourself to get one of these. Well done Casio! . I absolutely love this calculator. It’s capabilities are far beyond the comparable Texas instrument models and it is very user friendly. I currently use this for college maths and chemistry. The graphs are beautiful, fast, and there are numerous solving tooles such as min/max, intercepts, etc. additionally the factoring capability is wonderful and there is a button for everything. You can even change the log base so you don’t have to memorize the formula. All my professors allow it on tests and it’s been a life saver for me. For someone who has testing anxiety, a good calculator is a must because the last thing you want is to sit down and get frustrated over trying to work some old TI-83. I would definitely recommend this. . Casio, Texas Instrument, and HP each have a CAS (Computer Algebra System) graphing calculator model. I’ve used all three in calculus classes. My experience is as follows: 1) HP Prime – algorithms produced wrong results in calc II class. Notified HP and sold the calculator. 2) TI Nspire CX II CAS – I will admit up front that I am not a fan of the document-centric features of the Nspire series. The latest model is faster but eats up battery charge twice as fast, and has 10mb less user memory available. 3) Casio fx-CG500 – radically different user interface using a much larger screen. However, what really matters is the functionality. If you are taking calculus classes or above, you pretty much need a CAS graphing calculator. Here, the Casio fx-CG500 is a clear winner. It has more capability and features for higher math, and the user interface allows for much faster user input and all around ease of use. If you are a TI-Nspire fan, go to YouTube and search on Charlie Watson. You’ll find a complete course on using the Casio (he uses the classpad 400 which is the same). His videos are just of couple of minutes each, and you will see for yourself in the first dozen or so videos just how much easier it is to do math on the Casio than the TI. If you keep watching, you also will see what the Casio can do that TI and HP cannot.Just so you know – I teach elementary and intermediate algebra at my local community college. I’ve used TI calculators since the very early 70’s when they were red LEDs and used a 9-volt battery. I still have a TI-83 Plus Silver Edition, TI-84 Plus CE, TI-92 Plus, TI-Voyage 200, TI-89 Titanium, and TI-Nspire CX II CAS. As you can see, I am not a TI Nay-sayer, but in side by side comparisons with competing Casio models, Casio keeps coming out on top. I am not so sure that is surprising, since TI seems to have changed its focus from the end user to the education administrative policy makers. Read more
4 – Protective Case for Casio FX-9750GII
Top Reviews I ordered this case and it does not fit the TI-84PLCE graphing calculator. This case is 1 1/4 inches too short for the calculator. I double checked that I ordered the correct case and I did, which I returned. Please beware this case’s measurements/site is wrong. This case was 6 1/4 inches long and the calculator is 7 1/2 inches in length. . While it is true that the Texas Instruments TI-30XA has a built-in sliding cover, it is equally true that kiddo has a remarkable ability to find new ways to break things. Hey – that may be a future summer job, product tester/destroyer. Anyway, we don’t want the calculator destroyed as kiddo needs it for algebra, so in a belt-and-suspenders approach to protection, we have acquired this case. The calculator fits within nicely, the shell is fairly sturdy but soft, the zipper appears to be robust, and as long as kiddo doesn’t lose it (another great skill), the calculator will enjoy greater protection. The case could also be used to hold a smaller phone, an external battery pack, a pack of playing cards, a power adapter, or any number of other devices that we need to carry around. . Fits the size calculator as stated. Sturdy shell not flimsy. Could be used to carry anything really. . This seems like it will last as a case for my 12 year old son’s calculator. We will see but I am hopeful! Read more
~~ best calculators ,
Best casio fx-9750gii graphing calculator 2020.
Best casio fx-9750gii graphing calculator 2020.